From ActCoastal

Year 2016
Month July
Location San Diego
Description The July hearing of the Coastal Commission, held in San Diego, had two predominate themes: interpretation of Local Coastal Plans (LCPs) in light of the increasing body of knowledge around coastal hazards and the relationship between parking and public access to the coast.

A project representing each is evaluated in this month's vote chart: the Lindstrom development in Encinitas and the Dunes development in Venice.

Issues voted on at this Meeting

Click on an issue to read full description

Issue Summary Outcome
Dunes Development (Venice) This item is an appeal of a Coastal Development Permit approved by the City of Los Angeles to change a commercial retail space to a 2,831-sq.-foot restaurant. A key issue with this CDP is the lack of sufficient existing or proposed parking.

Staff recommended that the Commission determine substantial issue based on the project not being consistent with the parking requirements of the certified Land Use Plan (LUP). The lack of parking would adversely affect the public’s ability to access the coast. Additionally, approval of a development that worsens Venice’s current parking shortage in Venice will impair the City’s ability to prepare a certified LCP due to the project’s inconsistency with the LUP because it will generate increased parking demand and adversely impacts public access.

Red Dot.png
Encinitas Lindstrom Development This project was appealed by Commissioners Mary Schallenberger and Esther Sanchez due to not conforming to the City of Encinitas’ certified Local Coastal Plan. The proposed project is a bluff top residential development. The permit for the development, approved by the City, would allow for a two-story home plus basement with only a 40-foot setback from the bluff edge and include the installation of piers along the bluff edge to support planter boxes and an above-ground spa.

Upon review by the Commission’s geologist, it was determined that the factor of safety was not accurately calculated. Most significantly, the erosion factor for the site is anticipated to be .49 feet per year rather than .4 feet per year, which means a setback of 60 to 62 feet is what’s actually required to protect the home.

Green Dot.png

Vote Chart for this Meeting

Coastal Commission Vote Chart

July 2016 Meeting

Green Dot.png = Positive Conservation Vote         Red Dot.png = Negative Conservation Vote

Commissioner Dunes Development (Venice)Encinitas Lindstrom Development
CaroleGroom 2012.jpg Carole Groom Good Vote Good Vote
DBochco.jpg Dayna Bochco Bad Vote by Alternate Good Vote by Alternate
EffieT-S.png Effie Turnbull-Sanders Good Vote Good Vote
Erik-280x300.png Erik Howell Vote Unavailable Good Vote
GCox.png Greg Cox Bad Vote Good Vote
Vargas.jpg Mark Vargas Bad Vote Good Vote
McClure.jpg Martha McClure Bad Vote Good Vote
Shallenberger.jpg Mary K. Shallenberger Good Vote Good Vote
BVWtY5tv.jpeg Mary Luevano Bad Vote Good Vote
RU.jpg Roberto Uranga Bad Vote Good Vote
Kinsey.jpg Steve Kinsey Good Vote Good Vote
Mitchell.jpg Wendy Mitchell Good Vote Good Vote