Issue

Solana Beach Tennis Club Seawall Revised Findings

From ActCoastal

Month February
Year 2017
Summary The Solana Beach and Tennis Club shoreline armoring project was reviewed at the January 2016 Coastal Commission hearing and would have involved maintaining and expanding five existing sea cave infills with an additional 75-foot long “erodible” concrete notch in the coastal bluff. According to the applicant, the action was not currently critical to the structures on the coastal bluff, but was intended to protect beachgoers.

Commissioner Dayna Bochco asked the applicant to withdraw the application and resubmit a scaled-down test project version in order to ensure the material was truly erodible as proposed. The applicant opted not to withdraw and thus the application was denied in a vote of 9:2. Commissioners made it clear they do not want a large concrete experiment on the beach. The revised findings reflect the Commissioners’ direction that the applicant must test the erodibility of the proposed “erodible concrete” infill before it can be implemented in a larger scale project.

Commissioner Kinsey moved to adopt the revised findings and the motion passed unanimously.

Outcome Green Dot.png
Outcome Description The revised findings reflect the Commissioners’ direction that the applicant must test the erodibility of the proposed “erodible concrete” infill before it can be implemented in a larger scale project.
Why You Should Care The approval of the revised findings iterates that seacave infills can have negative effects on the surrounding bluffs that they become a part of, with bluffs continuing to erode around and behind the infill. The proposed infill material was “erodible” in theory, but no evidence supported that claim – and 75 feet of coastal bluff should not be used as a test subject. As climate change causes waves and weather to gain in intensity resulting in growing coastal impacts, hard-structures must not be our default response, but viewed with a critical eye.
Image Screen Shot 2017-02-22 at 12.27.22 PM.png
Decision Type Consideration of Revised Conditions and Findings
Staff Recommendation Approval of Revised Findings
Staff Report https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2017/2/th19a-2-2017.pdf
Lobbyist/Agent Walt Crampton
Opposition to Project Surfrider Foundation
Coastal Act Policies Chapter 3

Voting Detail for Solana Beach Tennis Club Seawall Revised Findings


Individual vote detail for Issue: Solana Beach Tennis Club Seawall Revised Findings
CommissionerVote
Greg CoxAbsent for Vote
Roberto UrangaGood Vote
Effie Turnbull-SandersGood Vote
Mark VargasGood Vote
Erik HowellAbsent for Vote
Mary LuevanoGood Vote
Steve KinseyGood Vote
Dayna BochcoGood Vote
Carole GroomGood Vote
Mary K. ShallenbergerAbsent for Vote


Meeting Page

View Meeting Page for the meeting where this issue was discussed/voted on.